The ego doesn't begin. It binds.
Time doesn't pass. It loops.
Repetition isn't failure. It's structure.
New piece on Deleuze, Freud and the strange mechanics of the self: The Passive Subject

The ego doesn't begin. It binds.
Time doesn't pass. It loops.
Repetition isn't failure. It's structure.
New piece on Deleuze, Freud and the strange mechanics of the self: The Passive Subject
Every man hears only what he understands.
[Es hört doch jeder nur, was er versteht.]
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) German poet, statesman, scientist
Sprüche in Prosa: Maximen und Reflexionen [Proverbs in Prose: Maxims and Reflections] (1833) [tr. Saunders (1893), “Life and Character,” #383]
Sourcing, notes, alternate translations: wist.info/goethe-johann/36052/
#statstab #292 The Interplay between Subjectivity, Statistical Practice, and Psychological Science
Thoughts: "transparent subjectivity leads to a more honest and fruitful analyses"
#bayesian #epistemology #subjectivity #science #stats #psychology
No man lives in the external truth among salts and acids, but in the warm, phantasmagoric chamber of his brain, with the painted windows and the storied wall.
Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) Scottish essayist, novelist, poet
Essay (1888-02), “The Lantern-Bearers,” sec. 3 Scribner’s Magazine, Vol. 3, No. 2
Sourcing, notes: wist.info/stevenson-robert-lou…
"In this issue our contributorsengage, in their different ways, with questions of subjectivity from within the Marxian problematic. From its very inception, Rethinking Marxism has been interested in exploring questions of subjectivity without falling into either the essentialist constructions of theoretical humanism or the determinist formations of theoretical structuralism. But the question of subjectivity has been central to Marxist thought from the very beginning. It is possible to trace the displacement of the problematic in Marx’s own writings from a standpoint of alienation and estrangement to that of exploitation and the division of mental and manual labor, from ideology to the fetishism of commodities. Again, in Lenin’s theory of corruption under imperialism and his insistence on the necessity of cultural revolution, the questions of subjectivity, if not formulated in this language, were central concerns. Lukàcs’s foregrounding of class consciousness under conditions of reification, Mao’s revolutionary political pedagogy, “from the masses, to the masses”; Adorno’s sustained engagement with fascism and the irrational beyond the collapse of Nazi Germany; Fanon’s writings on the psychic overdetermination of race, sexuality, and class under conditions of colonialism; Althusser’s materialist treatment of ideology in the context of the advanced capitalist state; E. P. Thompson’s historiography of the making of working-class consciousness; all are part of this persistent Marxist problematic around the question of the constitution of revolutionary subjectivity under capitalism and the subversion of that subjectivity by fascist currents that are, if not initially rallied, eventually welcomed by threatened capitalist classes."
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08935696.2024.2400014
A quotation from Bierce, Ambrose:
«
LAWFUL, adj. Compatible with the will of a judge having jurisdiction.
»
Full quote, sourcing, notes:
https://wist.info/bierce-ambrose/73063/
@cafexperiment This is one of those textual agglomerations that is so dense and so rife with implications about the nature of existence that upon reading all else falls away and one is left struck dumb in absorptive contemplation. #Stein #gertrudestein #text #writing #coffee #subjectivity #neuroscience #existence #writing #being #somatic #embodied #being #spatiality #cartography #site #self
How embarrassingly ironic that we let a minuscule minority of #sociopaths destroy the habitability of our #planet in their quest to profit from machines that think better than we do -- when the most important moral, ethical, and subjective questions can't be answered by machines because they mimic the sociopaths that built them.
Two top notch Blood Pattern Analysis articles by ProPublica:
"Julie Rea was convicted of killing her son largely on the testimony of bloodstain-pattern analysts. She was later acquitted and exonerated, joining a growing community of Americans wrongly convicted with bad science."
"How a Dubious Forensic Science Spread Like a Virus:
From his basement in upstate New York, Herbert MacDonell launched modern bloodstain-pattern analysis, persuading judge after judge of its reliability. Then he trained hundreds of others."
OnlineFirst - "The waste of nations: Household trash and the affective politics of recycling in Israel" by @dr_talinka
#waste #recycling #composting #subjectivity #IsraelPalestine
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/25148486241270096
A quotation from Maurois, Andre:
«
In literature, as in love, we are astonished at what is chosen by others.
[En littérature comme en amour, on est surpris par les choix des autres.]
»
Full quote, sourcing, notes:
https://wist.info/maurois-andre/2730/
The world that’s filtered through a sensor
is more than just a sterile tensor:
for all the truths in what’s outside,
the lies en route can’t be denied.
You sit behind your brain, I fear,
and every sense that you hold dear
is filtered through a lump of fat
while neuropeptides have a chat.
By the time a thing’s in your awareness
(that sense of conscious being-there-ness)
the world without’s been warped and twisted
by worlds within that once existed.
The things that you could swear are real
are mere veneers of what you feel:
the only truth you’ll ever know
is writ in what makes ions go –
and everything you’ve ever seen
has left a trail of dopamine.
Objective truth is nonexistent,
you’ve but the world that’s most consistent
with stimuli that came and went.
Don’t trust the world that’s evident,
for every rule’s a neural trick
and life is full of surprises.
#LouisCaruana - How Do We #Know What We Know?
“She drew our attention to language, #metaphors, gender and #subjectivity, and showed that these were relevant to science. Although Keller was sometimes mistakenly seen as a critic of science, she succeeded in her goal: to articulate fairer and better ways of living and doing science.” https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03819-4